Regulating content (either by protecting speech or protecting decency) does not address the underlying broken model that is based on companies silently and maliciously surveilling their users in an effort to invisibly affect future behavior. Centering privacy will protect people from highly extractive business models like the surveillance capitalism practiced by Facebook and Twitter. I believe we need to hold sacred the right to privacy. I don’t agree with either of these frames. Through preventing harmful content, we will prevent polarization and produce a more fair and equitable future. Platforms need to be held responsible for the harmful content they host. Protect decency: we need to ban harmful content online.
CAMINANTE NO HAY CAMINO YOUTUBE FREE
Through the free exchange of ideas, we will arrive at a more reasonable future. They need to be protected from censorship by anyone, the government or corporations. Protect free speech: social media, podcasts, etc are free speech regardless of who owns the platform or the content. The most common frames I see for regulating Big Tech and mitigating polarization: The 21st Century, Big Tech, and Polarization The main point is that all of us (not just men) need to be willing to change in order to recognize a more generative and equitable future. I think I would choose The Will to Change by bell hooks. Update: Someone asked me to recommend a book that is explicitly about feminism.
CAMINANTE NO HAY CAMINO YOUTUBE MOVIE
Both the movie and the book about Beane’s approach are worth it! Here is a link to the book: It’s not about getting the best individual people and extracting all we can from them, it’s about winning together. It may seem odd, but I think Billy Beane’s approach to the Oakland A’s embodies a lot of the way I think about feminism. I also blogged about power, but it’s nowhere near as genius as MPF: The book Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett includes a chapter on Power. I do not believe that the only way for one person to flourish is to extract from (and therefore lack mutual connection with) others. This means I explicitly reject the extractive paradigm under which we currently operate. In my view, what makes me a feminist is that I seek a world where all people to flourish. My feminist filter of the world has changed a lot through the years. (Side note: this episode covers some other distinctions I find valuable e.g. The guest, masculinity scholar Jackson Katz, explains that moral and political beliefs are distinct and can be different. Two of the hosts, Justin Baldoni and Jamey Heath, are deeply religious, and their religion says that abortion is morally wrong. Here is an episode of the Man Enough podcast, a podcast on masculinity and being a man, that captures that view well. Both sets of beliefs are incredibly important. I believe that you can hold a set of moral beliefs and a different set of political beliefs. I think my frame for reproductive rights has one major difference from the dominant frames. Yep, this topic has been in the news a lot lately. If you check out any of these resources, I would very much like to hear your reactions (and let you know that I am so thankful for your time and curiosity). In other words, you don’t need a bunch of deep knowledge of feminist theory or a philosophy 101 course in order to understand them. I tried to pick resources that are broadly accessible. Here are some resources I think capture some of the ways I think about the world. If you would like to get me a gift this year for my birthday, I invite you to learn about my worldview. For me, worldview means the frames through which we see the world, rather than where we fall on any one issue.
As I have said many times, I think the most precious gift you can give another human being is time, and I think the most meaningful way you can spend that time is by exchanging experiences and seeking to understand another’s worldviews. Tomorrow is my birthday, and I love celebrating! A few days ago, my husband and I were playing a game, and he asked me what would be my ideal gift.
0 kommentar(er)
